Tractor Registrations

Tractor registrations, often the bellwether for UK agriculture, have shown a sharp decline in April and May according to the Agricultural Engineers Association (AEA).  Compared to the previous year, registrations for these two months fell by 50.6% and 41.9%.  However, April 2019 was a particularly high point for registrations as there was an increase in purchases ahead of the original Brexit date.  Registrations for the year are down in total by 26.5%.  The lack of registrations is likely to be due to a combination of factors.  The Coronarvirus pandemic has seen factories temporarily shut, so orders will have been delayed.  This should mean we see an increase in registrations now factories are re-opening.  But registrations were likely to be have see a reduction, as the lack of winter drilling due to the weather and the uncertainties over Brexit will have had an impact on farmer confidence.

BPS 2020

Hopefully, all 2020 BPS claims will now have been submitted on time and correct.  But if this is not the case it is still possible to make a claim and also to make amendments to an already submitted application.  It is possible to make a late claim up until midnight on 10th July, but this will attract a 1% penalty for every working day late.  After the 10th July claims will not be accepted.  For those that got their claim in by 15th June, but subsequently find they need to make an alteration, certain changes can be made without penalty up until 30th June.  These are;

  • adding a land parcel
  • increasing the area being used to activate entitlements
  • changing the land use

These amendments can still be made from 1st July to 10th July but will attract late claim penalties on the amended parcels.

The above changes only refer to increasing the claim.  It is possible to make changes which do not increase the claim at any time.  Via the ‘Notified Error’ provisions it is possible to notify the RPA, in writing, at anytime (although see below) if you find you need to reduce the eligible area of a land parcel or change the land use declared.  It is possible to withdraw land which has become ineligible (i.e will not be used primarily for an agricultural activity for the whole of the year).  Examples might be because it has been sold out of agriculture or utility works are coming through.  Land parcels can be withdrawn from an application, or a BPS claim completely, by notifying the RPA in writing at anytime without penalty.

However, it is not possible to amend or withdraw an application if the claimant has;

  • been told about a non-compliance affecting the part of the application they want to withdraw or amend
  • had an inspection revealing non-compliance affecting the part of the application they want to withdraw or amend, or
  • received notification of an inspection

It is therefore important to let the RPA know straight away if you find a problem with a claim or a client notifies you, as once an inspection is notified it may not be possible to make any changes.

Foreign Seasonal Labour

Seasonal agricultural workers coming to England will be able to start work immediately.  Unlike other international travelers, those arriving to work on farms will not have to self-isolate for the first 14 days after they arrive as long as other rules and guidelines are adhered to.  However, before traveling, workers will have to complete a form with their journey, contact details and address of the farm on which they will be living and working.  If they are not staying at the farm they will not be able to work.  At UK border controls workers will have to prove they are are a seasonal agricultural worker.  On arrival into the UK, somebody from the farm where they will be living and working must collect them and take them straight there.  During the first 14 days, workers will need to follow social distancing rules and will only be able to leave the farm under strict circumstances, such as an emergency or to get essential supplies and medicines, only if these can’t be delivered.  The Government has produced strict guidelines for employers and workers to follow, these can be found at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coming-to-the-uk-for-seasonal-agricultural-work-on-english-farmshttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/coming-to-the-uk-for-seasonal-agricultural-work-on-english-farms

Organic Farming Statistics

The amount of land managed organically in the UK grew slightly in 2019.  Latest figures from Defra put the organic land area (both fully organic and in-conversion) at 485,000 hectares.  This is a rise of 2.4% compared to 2018.  However, it is 34% lower than the peak organic area seen in 2008.  This means around 2.7% of the total area on UK farms is organic.  There are differences between sectors.  Only 1.2% of the UK cereals area is organic, but this rises to 7.1% for vegetables.  The UK organic dairy herd is 2.8% of the total whilst the equivalent figures for beef, sheep, pigs and poultry are 2.3%, 2.4%, 0.8% and 1.9% respectively.  More details can be found at – https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/organic-farming-statistics-2019.

Emissions Trading Scheme

The Government has set out plans for a UK emissions trading scheme (ETS) that will operate once the country leaves the EU.  The proposals roll-over many of the features of the EU ETS, but it is stated that the UK scheme will have greater ambition to cut carbon output.  The scheme only applies to sectors that are deemed ‘energy intensive’ which does not currently include agriculture.  However, there is a clear policy goal to bring more sectors into a ‘carbon pricing’ mechanism in the future.  This may eventually see farming having to buy carbon credits or pay a carbon tax.  Further details on the ETS can be found at – https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-future-of-uk-carbon-pricing .

Covid Scheme Changes

Furlough Scheme

The Government has announced changes to the Covid furlough scheme (officially called the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – CJRS).  From the 1st July it will be possible to bring furloughed workers back on a part-time basis.  It will be possible to claim a CJRS grant for the normal hours not worked.

The scheme will close to new entrants from 30th June.  This means that employers will only be able to furlough employees that they have furloughed for a full 3-week period prior to 30th June – i.e. the final date by which an employer can furlough an employee for the first time will be 10th June.

The Government contribution to the CJRS will gradually taper down over the next few months;

  • June and July: The Government will pay 80% of wages up to a cap of £2,500.
  • August: The government will pay 80% of wages up to a cap of £2,500, but employers will become responsible for paying National Insurance and pension contributions (claimed to be 5% of employment costs for the average worker)
  • September:  The Government will pay 70% of wages up to a cap of £2,187.50.  Employers will pay 10% of wages (plus NI and pension contributions) to make up 80% of an employees wages, up to a cap of £2,500.
  • October:  The Government will pay 60% of wages up to a cap of £1,875.  Employers will contribute 20% plus NI and pension costs.

For more details see – https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-for-wages-through-the-coronavirus-job-retention-scheme

Self-Employed Scheme

There has also been an update on the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS).

  • A second (and final) round of funding will be made available in August.  The grant will be worth 70% of average monthly trading profits, paid out in a single instalment covering three months’ worth of profits, and capped at £6,570 in total.  For example, the first round might cover losses during March, April and May of this year, with the second round covering June, July and August. 
  • It will still be possible to apply to the first round of the SEISS until 13th July.  This provides eligible individuals with a taxable grant worth 80% of their average monthly trading profits, paid out in a single instalment covering three months’ worth of profits, and capped at £7,500 in total.
  • The eligibility criteria are the same for both grants, and individuals will need to confirm that their business has been adversely affected by coronavirus. An individual does not need to have claimed the first grant to receive the second grant: for example, they may only have been adversely affected by Covid-19 in the later phase.

Further guidance on the second grant will be published on Friday 12th June.  For details see – https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-a-grant-through-the-coronavirus-covid-19-self-employment-income-support-scheme

Agri Food Prospects after Covid

At one point in May, a toilet roll was worth more than a barrel of crude oil and the Bank of England sold gilts with a negative yield to willing buyers (which has never happened before).  We have all lived through several decades this year already!  As the lockdown begins to ease, this article looks at some of the longer-term effects of the outbreak on the agri-food sector.

Waste and the Environment

In the short term it appears from The Grocer and other sources that food waste in the house has fallen by as much as a quarter.  In the case of dairy, this may be more than the total decrease in consumption, suggesting the decline in demand could be just because we are being more careful with food.  It is an expensive improvement for the food and farming industry, but waste reduction is a good thing; a considerable achievement whilst the country spends two months thinking more carefully about food.  The same is apparently true for other sectors such as bread.  Whether this will last remains to be seen (we have our doubts).  With open-air markets reopening this month, other elements of the food chain are starting reappear and ease the supply through the supermarkets.  Incidentally, the reduction of waste has been seen in other non-food sectors too and of course consumption is down of many resources.  It would be an environmental boon if society could learn at least a few small lessons from lock-down of constraining unnecessary consumption.

Economics

The economic downturn will be the longest lasting part of the pandemic, currently underestimated by the stock market.  Agriculture and food supply will be affected (albeit less than some non-essential industry sectors).  But economic issues including currency, trade facilitation, tax and capital will have a greater and more lasting impact on food supply than the possible shortening of supply chains and introduction of robotics that some have suggested.  Businesses will be expected to share the burden of paying for what has happened, and that includes many farmers and rural entrepreneurs.  However, in times of recession it is good to be part of an industry that supplies a commodity that is necessary and its consumption doesn’t change substantially depending on wealth.  Agriculture does relatively well in recessions.

Around a third of the economy was closed down, with a view to reopening parts of it gradually at Government’s choosing.  Farming carried on.  Government protection schemes cannot last for ever and when they end, we can insolvencies and business failures.  The Financial Crisis of 2007-08 caused a 5% fall in GDP and it took 5 years to return to 2007 economic levels.  This March alone saw our economy shrink by that much.  The Spanish Flu in 1918-19 led to a 27% reduction in world GDP.  The Office of Budgetary Responsibility predicts a record 35% reduction in GDP for the second quarter of 2020, a 300-year record.  We will also inevitably have to start paying for the extraordinary debt the nation has incurred since January, certainly the highest since the last World War.  There are four ways of clearing debt; Default, Economic Growth, Taxation, and Inflation;

Default: No country will opt willingly to default on its debt as it is good for nobody.

Growth: Rapid growth will help get people back into work.  It will require softer business regulations and free market encouragement.  For instance, brewers currently require licences to deliver beer to consumers rather than pubs which prevented many from operating in March and April.  Small business flexibility is required.  Growth of the manufacturing sector will support greater employment and will also build the secondary service sector.  Farming could help here.  Sterling might prove too strong and fall in value here to encourage trade and exports.  Farming would benefit from a weaker Pound.

Taxation: Tax increases on the ‘haves’ are inevitable.  Farmers are generally in this cohort, by assets at least.  Those with income may bear the brunt of higher taxes but also those with property, or other assets could face a larger tax burden – i.e. changes in capital taxes.

Inflation: The only winner from inflation is the borrower.  It erodes debt as fast as assets.  This will not help the landowner, but the farmer, as manufacturer of commodities is owning one of the most inflation-proof assets.  A weak currency, massive quantitative easing and record low Base Rates (especially when oil prices rise) are inflationary.  High unemployment, reduced consumption and spare economic capacity are deflationary.

Adam Smith pointed out that capital in business flows in two directions, to labour or the owners.  Government is looking after the worker, but will not support the capitalists; they will lose value in their shares when the dividends are cancelled or profits fall. Those with capital will suffer from inflation when it goes up and will pay more in tax. If the day of the capitalist is toughening, perhaps the day of the entrepreneur is about to dawn. Free trade is the best way to re-establish supply chains that are not so fragile.  Government policy will presumably refocus on the big economic issues for a while. The farming budget has probably travelled far enough not to have to turn back.  But will HS2 survive?

Trade

An upsurge of protectionism is presumably inevitable.  It was already happening with the US, Chinese spat.  But more locally, irrational protective actions are taking place defending food supplies in a local store for locals only.  We should remember that, whilst it is good to provide business to local firms, becoming self-sufficient would in fact lower our food security.  The optimal food security needs to be calculated and the market allowed to achieve it and trade should be embraced.  Many supply chains will look to reduce the linkages.  Whilst for many it might mean buying more UK food, for others, buying from a single supplier from far away is a smaller supply chain than lots of smaller local suppliers. Economics will retain a key role and relationships too, that is what builds an economy

Opportunities

Innovative people have been using lockdown time being thoughtful and creative.  Many more patents have been registered than usual since January.  This might be because there is time on people’s hands, possibly because the world has suddenly changed, and new ideas are required.  Change creates threats, and opportunity.   Very big parts of the economy were already in the process of radical transformation, and this epidemic will accelerate this.

The world will endeavour to recover whilst undergoing the transition to non-fossil fuels.  This is one of the big issues of the 2020’s.  The virus has helped; whilst in lockdown, fossil fuels have accounted for less than 15% of electricity generation.

Brexit Update

Aside from details of the UK’s new Global Tariff regime published on 19th May (click here for article), there have been other notable recent developments in the Brexit negotiations.  These relate to the publication of the UK Government’s draft legal text for a UK-EU Comprehensive  Free-Trade Agreement (CFTA) and its proposals to implement the Northern Ireland (NI)-Ireland (IRL) Protocol.

Draft UK-EU Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (CFTA)

This draft legal text was published on 19th May and forms a key part of the UK’s approach to the future relationship with the EU.  It elaborates on the objectives of the ‘Canada-style’ trading relationship which the Government set-out in February.  David Frost (UK’s Chief Negotiator) has insisted that the proposals approximate very closely what the EU has already agreed with Canada and Japan.

However, the EU is insisting that to get the kind of deal which the UK is seeking, it needs to agree to ‘level playing-field’ provisions designed to stop the UK from undercutting the EU’s rules on State Aid, tax, labour and environmental regulation.  According to trade experts, the UK’s ambitions in areas such as the mutual recognition of qualifications (e.g. lawyers) goes beyond what is contained in other FTAs, including Canada and Japan.  It is seen by Brussels as an attempt to ‘cherry-pick’ aspects of its current access to the Single Market, and the EU is unlikely to offer concessions on this without some commitments to its level playing-field requirements.

Other areas of friction relate to the EU’s demands for access to the UK’s fishing waters, Britain’s objections to any role for the European Court of Justice in overseeing any eventual deal and arrangements for the implementation of the NI-IRL Protocol (see below).

The draft legal text (292 pages) contains limited (six) references to agriculture and these primarily refer to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. The legal text is accessible via; https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/886010/DRAFT_UK-EU_Comprehensive_Free_Trade_Agreement.pdf

Whilst it is useful to get sight of the UK’s proposed legal text, this should be very much seen as a negotiating position.  The situation is likely to evolve significantly as discussions progress with the EU in the coming weeks.

NI-IRL Protocol

On 20th May, the UK Government set-out its proposed approach on implementing NI-IRL Protocol.  A core focus of this document is on protecting Northern Ireland’s place within the UK Customs Territory and to minimise the scope for friction on GB-NI trade. It plans to do this by;

  1.  Unfettered access on trade going from NI to GB: meaning that trade should continue as it does now, with no additional processes, paperwork or restrictions on such trade. The EU is unlikely to have problems with this as it is an internal UK matter. However, one area where there may be a potential issues is the EU foresees NI businesses having to implement its Customs Code and, as a result, exit summary declarations would be required on shipments leaving NI to the rest of the UK or other non-EU countries. 
  2.  Trade going from GB to NI: no tariffs will be levied on such trade if the goods remain within the UK Customs Territory (i.e. stays in NI).  Only goods ultimately entering Ireland or the Rest of the EU, or have a high risk of doing so would face tariffs.  Here, the EU takes a very different view and sees all goods entering into NI from GB as ‘at risk’ of moving South.  It believes that where goods have tariff differentials between the UK and the EU, there is a significant risk of smuggling.  It is clear that this will be one of the main areas of contention when it comes to discussions within the Joint Committee that will oversee the implementation of the Protocol.
  3.  No new customs infrastructure in Northern Ireland: whilst acknowledging that there would be some additional processes and documentation for goods, particularly agri-food, arriving into NI, these would be ‘de-dramatised’ as much as possible and no new physical customs infrastructure would be built.  That said, there would be some expansion of additional entry points for agri-food goods to provide for proportionate controls.  This will be another issue to watch, but the UK Government’s proposals appear to give it some wriggle-room to expand existing infrastructure to manage arrangements.  There are still many challenges here concerning agri-food as these will be the most arduous controls to manage, but the UK has made some progress in recruiting additional veterinarians for example. 
  4. Northern Ireland benefits from UK trade deals with third countries: sets out the ambition for NI businesses to benefit from lower tariffs associated with any such deals, just as GB businesses would. What NI businesses can eventually avail of will also be contingent on the specific arrangements that third countries who strike FTAs with the UK are comfortable with.

Another point to note is that the UK appears to be placing a greater emphasis on using the Joint Committee to oversee the implementation of the NI-IRL Protocol as a negotiating forum, whereas the EU sees it as a body to implement what has already been negotiated.  The issues above will no doubt be opened up for debate at the Joint Committee’s next meeting in early June.  Further detail on the UK’s approach is available via: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-uks-approach-to-the-northern-ireland-protocol

Overall, there is a sense that momentum is building ahead of the next European Council (18-19th June) which will have a key role in any decision to extend the Transition Period beyond December 2020 (decision is due by 30th June), or to provide an alternative ‘fudge’ which extends the negotiating period until October possibly.  Whilst the UK is adamant that it will not extend the Transition beyond 31st December, influential voices are calling for an extended implementation period of 6-9 months beyond June 2020.  They claim that this would allow businesses to make the legal changes necessary to implement what has been agreed during the negotiating phase (taking place during the transition).  Whether all of this can be agreed and implemented within an additional 6-9 months remains a tall order, but any additional time would be welcomed by most businesses currently having to grapple with the Covid crisis.

EU Farm Strategies

The EU has published two strategies that are likely to have a  long-term effect on its farming industry.  The ‘Farm to Fork’ (F2F) and Biodiversity Strategies are core elements of the European Green Deal and set out the EU’s long-term goals and direction of travel for the agri-food sector for the next 10 years.  In the F2F Action Plan, the EU’s Executive has pledged to cut the overall use of chemical pesticides and the use of more hazardous pesticides by 50% by 2030.  It is also committed to reduce nutrient losses by 50%, ensuring there is no deterioration in soil fertility whilst reducing the use of fertilisers by at least 20% by the end of the decade.  Pledges also include the reduction of EU sales of anti-microbials for farmed animals and fish by 50% by 2030 and to halve the food waste per person at both retail and consumer level over the same timeline.  Furthermore, an Action Plan for Organic Farming is due to be published later this year, with the goal of reaching 25% of the EU’s agriculture land being farmed organically by 2030.  Acknowledging the current Covid-19 pandemic, the plan underlines ‘the importance of a robust and resilient food system that functions in all circumstances..’.  Through the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 ‘Bringing nature back into our lives’ the Commission has pledged to transform at least 30% of Europe’s land and seas into effectively-managed protected areas.  One of the key commitments under the strategy is to introduce legally binding nature restoration targets in 2021, with the aim, by the end of the decade to have ‘significant areas of degraded and carbon-rich ecosystems restored’.

Oxford Farming Conference Cancelled

The organisers of the Oxford Farming Conference have decided to cancel the 2021 event, due to be held in early January next year.  Like many other gatherings, the OFC21 has fallen foul of the Covid-19 outbreak.  Although many months away, the organisers felt that they could not take the financial risk of booking venues with the threat that the conference could not go ahead.  There will be an online OFC instead on the 7th January 2021.