The need to provide a clearer indication of the direction of travel with Environmental Land Management schemes, is one of seven key recommendations, made by the National Audit Office (NAO), to Defra. The NAO is responsible for holding Government and the Civil Service to account over key policies. The NAO published its value for money report on the Farming and Countryside Programme on 23rd July 2024.
The report assesses how the Programme is developed and managed, its ability to deliver environmental outcomes, food production, and secure a thriving farming sector, whilst assessing value for money. The value for money metric is centred on value of the scheme to the taxpayer. Providing good value for money will be imperative if the schemes are going to be supported by Government in the future.
There are seven key recommendations of the report;
- Ensure that the business case for the next phase (phase 3) of the programme includes a ‘comprehensive and realistic’ assessment of the funding needed to meet Defra’s objectives. At present, the funding is based on what was available through EU CAP, not upon what Defra is trying to achieve.
- Use the business case to provide clearer direction of travel for support schemes. The NAO especially highlights the need to provide detail on the split between funding for SFI versus other, more substantive schemes. There is concern from the NAO that SFI could absorb too much of the budget whilst not delivering value for money to the same extent as schemes like Landscape Recovery.
- Strengthen the programmes’ environmental objectives, including setting targets for the ‘apex goal’ of delivering greater species abundance. The report mentions that Defra have set objectives for the Programme. However in some cases they lack sufficient data to assess progress against these objectives.
- Improve digital and data infrastructure to reduce reliance on legacy systems, which are due to expire in the coming years.
- Deliver a comprehensive and unified package of advice for farmers. The report highlights the success of the Future Farm Resilience Fund in delivering business advice. The advice has been valued by farmers. However, the NAO feel there should be more advice targeted at delivering better environmental outcomes.
- Use existing feedback channels to understand better farmers’ capacity for, and response to, continued change. This should centre on how change will impact engagement levels.
- Increase transparency to stakeholders around subjects like farm viability and land-use modelling. More transparency is needed around Defra’s plans to increase the regulatory baseline and stop paying for certain actions as they become the industry standard. On the theme of value for money, the report points to the actions for IPM and Soil Management Plans, and the SFI Management Payment as delivering low value for money although it increases engagement with other actions.
The report also gives some key facts and figures about the Programme.
- 35% of farmers don’t feel confident that Defra (and its ALBs) can deliver changes to its schemes and regulations
- Only 48% of farms are not positive about their future in farming
- 48% of farmers rate their satisfaction with SFI at 8/10 or higher; this figure rises to 81% for ratings of 6/10. It will be interesting to see how this evolves for 2024, given further changes to the delivery
- On average it takes 8 days to process an SFI application in 2024 (compared to several months for equivalent applications in 2021)
The full NAO report can be found at – https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/the-farming-and-countryside-programme/ .