Defra has released an analysis of the responses it received to its consultation on the new Environmental Land Management (ELM) scheme. In total there were 1,672 responses, giving a wide variety of viewpoints on how the scheme should be developed and in some cases amended. The full analysis document can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/environmental-land-management-policy-discussion-document#history. Unsurprisngly, the biggest difference in responses was between farmers and stakeholders with an environmental and conservation focus. The former being more concerned with ‘the importance of food production and ensuring the financial viability of farming in the UK’.
There were strong themes which came through in the responses including:
- Widespread support for the design principles – but respondents would like to see enhancements in; environmental outcomes, inclusivity & fairness, flexibility & options and minimal complexity and admin
- Scepticism as to whether the scheme as currently proposed will deliver the objectives – respondents said there was a lack of ambition and detail. Areas which should be included within the principles or addressed by the objectives include; greater recognition of food production or of balancing environment and food production, ensuring sufficient financial support for participants and the inclusion of the principles of rewilding
- The key barrier to participating – poor previous experience and the complexity and bureaucracy seen with past schemes
- The main driver for participation – financial and easier application process. There was evidence of a need for advice, particularly during the application process
- Support for monitoring through self assessment – particularly for using photos and Apps for location and date tagging
- Overwhelming support for testing and piloting the scheme – especially around payment & reward systems, outcomes and effectiveness, monitoring and ease of the application process.
Defra has also confirmed, in response to feedback, it is no longer using ‘tiers’ to describe the different parts of the scheme. These will now be called ‘components’ and the full names will be used whenever possible; Sustainable Farming Incentive, Local Nature Recovery and Landscape Recovery. Likewise it will refer to ELM as Environmental Land Management as much as possible.