Article 50 Ruling
The Government has lost its appeal in the Article 50 case. Eleven Supreme Court Judges ruled by a margin of 8 to 3 that Parliamentary consent is required before the clause can be triggered. This backs the earlier High Court decision (see November article) and means the Government must rethink its plans to use the Royal Prerogative to kick-start the Brexit process.
The Supreme Court did not rule on the form that Parliament’s consent needs to take. The Government duly presented a very short Bill (of only two lines) a couple of days after the Court’s ruling. The full(!) Bill can be found at – http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2016-2017/0132/17132.pdf. The timetable is for this to pass through the House of Commons by the 8th February and the House of Lords soon after. This would still allow the clause to be invoked by the end of March as planned. However, MPs will almost certainly try to attach amendments to the Bill, either to try and specify the type of Brexit that is acceptable, or simply to ensure that Parliament has a say in the negotiation process. The SNP has stated that it will table 50 amendments. With a Conservative majority in the Commons, and Labour pledged not to obstruct any legislation, then the passage of the Bill could still be relatively swift. There is a suggestion that the process may become bogged-down in the Lords however.
The fact that the Government believes it can stick to its Article 50 timetable, despite the Supreme Court’s decision, rather begs the question why the original ruling was appealed at all and why the Government didn’t put a simple Bill before Parliament to start with. The impression of making policy up as it goes along was reinforced the day after the Court ruling. Theresa May told Parliament that the Government would be publishing a full White Paper setting out a Brexit plan. This is despite David Davies stating the day before that it was not necessary.
The Supreme Court also ruled on the role of devolved nations in the Article 50 process. It found that the administrations at Holyrood, Cardiff and Belfast do not have to approve the triggering of Article 50 – it is solely a matter for the UK Parliament.
Welsh Brexit White Paper
On the subject of devolved administrations, the Welsh Government has published plans for what it wants to see from Brexit. A White Paper called ‘Securing Wales’; Future’ was published on the 23rd January (see https://beta.gov.wales/brexit ). Along the same lines as the paper from the Scottish Government in December, this sets out the priorities for Wales in the Brexit negotiations. They include;
- ‘full and unfettered’ access to the Single Market – access for Welsh foodstuffs is specifically mentioned as being key
- continuing to allow migration – by linking freedom of movement to employment
- any EU funding to Wales must be replicated by UK funds
- no reversal of powers already devolved to Wales and Brexit should be used as an opportunity for a debate about the future constitutional arrangements of the UK
- legislation to protect the environment and works rights should not be weakened as a result of Brexit
- in light of the timings for Brexit, the UK should consider transitional arrangements